Were Travelers on JetBlue Flight Exposed to Toxic And Carcinogenic Smoke From Laptop Fire?

May 31, 2017 / 1 Comment

Planegard provided photo from a fire containment test.

JetBlue Flight 915 from New York to San Francisco made an emergency landing this morning in Grand Rapids, Michigan after a laptop battery caught fire in the overhead bin of the passenger cabin. News reports suggest none of the 158 passengers was injured. That may not be entirely correct. The fact is we don’t know what what might be the consequences on their future health. What is known is that what comes out of a burning lithium ion battery is not good.

According to a study by nine European scientists and published on MDPI, an online peer-reviewed platform, one substance known to be present in the smoke, acrolein, is carcinogenic. A second, hydrogen fluoride, is corrosive to the skin and respiratory tract. Benzene, styrene, and seven others in the alphabet soup science enjoys as much as aviation have also been detected in the fumes. Reading through their hazardous properties is not for the faint of heart.

Given that, the warning that the area around a burning battery should be evacuated makes good sense.

Well that’s not possible on an airliner flying at 38 thousand feet, so the crew of Flight 915 should be commended for getting the plane down as quickly as possible after passengers saw the smoke billowing out of the overhead bin.

Pilots don’t like fires, as explained clearly by airline captain Jim Blaszczak, in my book, The Crash Detectives.

“If there is any indication of smoke or fire, the definition of eternity is from now until we get this airplane on the ground,” he told me.

Until he retired last year, Blaszczak flew the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, on which are carried two super-duper lithium ion batteries. The wisdom of this design has been questioned by many. But the JetBlue fire raises an entirely different issue for the flying public; just where can the devices we cherish be safely carried?

Should I travel with my Lenovo Yoga?

Even as Flight 915 passengers were preparing for their trans-continental flight, safety and security officials in Europe were debating expanding the American order to place laptops and other large electronic devices into the baggage hold on flights from Europe.

Safety specialists don’t like the idea. A battery fire should not be allowed to smolder undetected in an inaccessible compartment of an airliner transiting the Atlantic. That’s why you’ll see folks voting for the slightly better alternative; bring lithium ion batteries into the cabin where a fire can be detected before it gets out of control.

This appears to be safer when the health effects of breathing toxic, caustic, carcinogenic smoke and fumes is left out of the equation.

Lithium ion batteries, we love ’em, we rely on ’em, but we cannot get away from the thorny issues that when it comes to carrying them on airplanes, they may kill us one way or another.

 

(Visited 408 times, 1 visits today)
Categories: Flying Lessons


One response to “Were Travelers on JetBlue Flight Exposed to Toxic And Carcinogenic Smoke From Laptop Fire?”

  1. Lou Andelmo says:

    Great article, Christine. The main thing about the reporting of this incident was the news media reported that was a laptop that cause the problem. Big difference in the battery size in a laptop and the battery in a vaping device. That opens up a whole new area of discussion about electronic device sizes that are going to be permitted on board. Then it becomes an issue of, do you really want that occurring in a cargo hold? Size of the device really isn’t the issue like the TSA is saying in its ban of anything larger than a smart phone. Real Catch 22 here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter to Win

Want to receive some free swag from Christine? Sign up for the mailing list!

Top